The decision in the Prize Cases, 5 although not dealing directly with the subject of martial law, gave national scope to the same general principle in 1863. 4 In this case, the Court found that the Rhode Island legislature had been within its rights in resorting to the rights and usages of war in combating insurrection in that state. Borden 3 that state declarations of martial law were conclusive and therefore not subject to judicial review. In the early years of the Supreme Court, the American judiciary embraced the latter theory as it held in Luther v. 2 By the second theory, martial law can be validly and constitutionally established by supreme political authority in wartime. The first, which stems from the Petition of Right, 1628, provides that the common law knows no such thing as martial law 1 that is to say, martial law is not established by official authority of any sort, but arises from the nature of things, being the law of paramount necessity, leaving the civil courts to be the final judges of necessity. Two theories of martial law are reflected in decisions of the Supreme Court. United States Library of Congress, The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation What Is Martial Law and Is It An Option in the U.S.? The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. What Are the President's Military Powers?Īrticle II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution states: This article examines the President's ability to declare martial law as part of the duties as Commander in Chief. Under the Constitution, both the President and Congress can declare martial law because both are in charge of the military. This includes using military courts for trials during wartime and the use of military forces within the United States. Army Reserve.) 37 pp.Martial Law is when a city, state, or country is placed under the control of the military. (Written for the 301st Civil Affairs Group, U.S. These theories are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Marcos is protecting foreign investors and granting huge incentives for oil exploration, against the wishes of the Congress some believe that his purpose is to stabilize himself in power and avoid demanding that the United States pay rent on its Philippine bases. (3) The "imperialist lackey" view focusses on Marcos' relations to United States and multinational business interests. (2) Another view sees martial law as Marcos' way of circumventing congressional and bureaucratic obstruction to achieve reforms and eliminate corruption-whether for altruistic or selfish reasons. Three alternative explanations for the martial law decision are: (1) The official, constitutional explanation is the threat of violent rebellion. The country was suffering from grinding poverty, widespread corruption, a stalled political and judicial system, and internal violence. Discusses the imposition of martial law by President Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines in September 1972.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |